Questions,
answered.

An independent layer that proves AI-produced work. Whatever a model makes, Praxis checks it against what was actually asked and shows that it holds. It sits outside the model, so the proof doesn't rest on trusting the thing that did the work. Why this matters.

Vibe coding means jumping straight from a rough ask to output and hoping it's right. Anti-vibe coding keeps the speed and puts the plan back. The ask becomes a spec you can audit, and every step is checked against it. You still move fast. You just stop shipping on faith. How it works.

CRAFT is the pipeline that turns a rough ask into software you can prove. Five stages, Capture, Rehearse, Author, Field, and Track, with one spec running through every one. Anti-vibe coding is the discipline. CRAFT is how you do it. See the pipeline.

Yes. There is a live check on the site. Bring a piece of AI output and the ground truth it should answer to: a code change and the test it must pass, a claim and its source, a number and the data behind it. Watch it get held to the standard right in your browser. Nothing is uploaded. It runs one check. The real pipeline runs hundreds. Try the live check.

No. Turning an RFP, SOW, or brief into an auditable spec is what runs today, but the standard isn't tied to that. The same three checks land on a document, a code change, or an analysis. The substrate doesn't care about the domain. It cares that what shipped can be shown to be right.

An RFP, an SOW, a brief, or an unformed idea. Praxis turns it into a spec you can audit, and stands behind what comes out of it. Whatever you bring, you can follow every claim back to the ask.

A dossier you can hand to a client: an executive summary, the technical design and the reasoning behind it, infrastructure, a low-level design, a delivery plan, and the diagrams that make it legible. Every claim ties back to a requirement, and every requirement ties back to your ask. See what ships.

Every requirement is numbered, measurable, and traced back to the sentence in the ask it came from. What the ask left out is flagged as an open question, not filled with a guess. You can hand it to an evaluator who trusts none of it, and they can check it line by line. See the specification.

The spec is your requirements, lifted out and made auditable, with the gaps named instead of guessed. The dossier is the full deliverable Praxis builds from that spec: the design, the plan, and the diagrams. The spec is the foundation. The dossier is what goes on the table. See the specification.

Yes. The dossier keeps a consistent backbone, an executive summary, technical design, infrastructure, low-level design, delivery plan, and a traceable appendix, and it can be shaped to your house format and branding. The sections scale with the work, from a short brief to a full build.

Every step carries a record: the claim, the check that ran against it, the result, and a trace back to the requirement. Three independent parties sign it, a maker, a pilot, and a watcher outside the system. What ships is a record you can check, not a promise you have to trust. See proven delivery.

The maker checks its own work, a pilot re-checks every step against the contract, and an independent watcher checks the pilot. Nothing ships unproven. See the three checks.

That's what the checks are for. The pilot re-checks every step against the contract and an independent watcher checks the pilot, so a mistake is caught before it ships. Where the source is genuinely silent, the gap is flagged as an open question, not filled with a guess.

Every requirement points back to the sentence it came from, and every diagram and claim ties back to a requirement. You can follow the thread end to end and audit the coverage yourself, instead of taking the output on faith.

No. Praxis runs on any model, cloud or your own hardware. The model is swappable. The verification stays constant. Sovereign and on-prem are just one end of the same dial.

Pick the model that fits your cost, latency, or sensitivity needs: a frontier model, an open one, or a local model on your own hardware. Praxis treats the model as swappable, so the choice stays yours to change at any time, and the verification around it doesn't move.

Teams that have to stand behind what they ship. Bid and proposal teams turning an RFP into a proposal they can defend. Founders pressure-testing an idea before they build it. Engineering teams shipping AI-written code they can trust. And regulated or sovereign organisations that need an audit trail on their own ground. See how it fits together.

Yes. The record is written while the work happens, not reconstructed for the meeting. Every decision traces to a requirement, the model and the ground it ran on are yours to choose, and a watcher outside the system signs the result. For regulated and sovereign.

Yes. Praxis runs in the cloud or on your own hardware, including on-prem and sovereign setups. The work never has to leave your environment for the verification to hold.

Yes. Praxis can run entirely on your own hardware, in your own region, with a local model, so both your work and where it lives stay under your control. Nothing has to cross a border or a vendor boundary for the verification to hold.

Your work stays under your control. On an on-prem or local setup it never leaves your systems, so it isn't sitting on someone else's servers. You decide what's shared and where it's processed.

No. Your work is used to do your work, not to train anything. You decide what to share, and on an on-prem setup it never has to leave your own environment.

The contact form opens an email in your own mail app. Nothing reaches us until you send it, so you decide exactly what to share and when.

The source ask is enough: the RFP, SOW, or brief you're responding to, or the idea you want pressure-tested. If parts are missing, Praxis flags them as open questions rather than guessing, so you can start with whatever you have.

That is what CRAFT is: the pipeline builds from the spec with a check on every step. Turning a fuzzy ask into an auditable spec is substantially there today, and the build stages carry the same spec forward, so the code answers to the exact thing you agreed. See the pipeline.

Tell us what you'd verify and we'll talk it through. We'd rather scope it to your work than quote a number at a form.